High court declines to force JobsOhio agreement

A divided Ohio Supreme Court tossed a complaint Friday that state officials hoped might resolve legal concerns about the state's new private job-creation entity and seal JobsOhio's right to run the state liquor business and use its profits.
Associated Press
Sep 28, 2012

In a 4-2 decision, justices said the high court was the wrong venue for JobsOhio's complaint against state Commerce Director David Goodman.

The action sought to force Goodman to sign an agreement between the state commerce and budget departments and JobsOhio transferring rights to the liquor business to JobsOhio for 25 years. The deal is worth some $1.4 billion, with the state getting the first $500 million when the transfer occurs.

Budget and JobsOhio leaders signed the agreement in August. Goodman declined because JobsOhio's constitutionality is still in legal limbo.

A message seeking comment on the decision was left Friday with a JobsOhio spokeswoman.

Justices threw out the challenge in part because they realized that a lawsuit by an agency envisioned by Gov. John Kasich suing one of Kasich's Cabinet directors had a purpose beyond securing Goodman's signature.

Goodman said at the time the complaint was filed that he fully supported JobsOhio but didn't feel he could move forward while the suit was undecided.

Justices wrote, "First, a review of the complaint — as well as Goodman's motion for judgment on the pleadings — indicates that the real object sought is a declaratory judgment, which this court lacks original jurisdiction to grant."

"Although JobsOhio's complaint is couched in terms of compelling ODC Director Goodman to comply with his affirmative duty," they added, "... it actually seeks an expedited ruling from this court declaring (bills creating JobsOhio) constitutional, so as to preclude any further challenges."

The transfer process has been delayed by a lawsuit by the liberal policy group ProgressOhio and two Democratic state lawmakers, Rep. Dennis Murray of Sandusky and Sen. Mike Skindell of Lakewood, challenging the constitutionality of turning public money over to a private entity.

The 10th District Court of Appeals in Columbus upheld a judge's decision to dismiss the challenge on the grounds that opponents didn't have legal standing. ProgressOhio appealed the decision to the state Supreme Court, which hasn't yet ruled on that issue of legal standing. The libertarian 1851 Center for Constitutional Law has sided with ProgressOhio in legal filings.

ProgressOhio Executive Director Brian Rothenberg said the court's decision leaves open the question of what legal avenue exists to challenge JobsOhio.

"Once again this court said there are legitimate constitutional issues that have to be aired," he said. "So, with $550 million of state money being dangled in the hands of a private corporation like JobsOhio, when will the state allow a court to make a ruling on its constitutionality?"

He blamed the administration — not his group's lawsuit — for delays in getting JobsOhio up and running.

"The bottom line is these are self-inflicted wounds by the Kasich administration," he said. "They could have let a court decide this over a year ago and rule on the constitutionality, but they decided to play these games of challenging our legal standing and this bizarre move to having Kasich's JobsOhio sue Kasich's Cabinet director."

Friday's decision was joined by Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor and Justices Evelyn Lundberg Stratton, Judith Ann Lanzinger, and Yvette McGee Brown. Justices Paul Pfeifer and Robert Cupp entered separate dissents. Justice Terrence O'Donnell didn't participate in the deliberations or decision.

 

Comments

DGMutley

JobsOhio = a license for payola? How can one ever know with the secrecy.

Kimo

All people are created equal, but people with money are just a little bit more equal. Does Jobsohio have a secret handshake for business deals?

Contango

How exactly does JobsOhio equate to liquor profits?

Ohio's liquor laws are byzantine anyway and a throwback to the 1930s.

Increasing the number of package stores will see growth in jobs, commerce and tax revenue.

Privatize, privatize, privatize.

Didn't Mr. Clinton say that "the era of big govt." was over? He wasn't 'lying' was he?

buckeye15

Are you suggesting JobsOhio is a good thing?

Contango

@ buckeye15:

How was I not clear?

mrlizzzard

Moderators have removed this comment because it contained Personal attacks (including: name calling, presumption of guilt or guilt by association, insensitivity, or picking fights).