Sexting charges sexist

Matt Westerhold
Mar 23, 2010


A teen girl who sent a nude photograph of herself to her boyfriend using her cell phone was charged with unruliness after her 18-year-old boyfriend forwarded that same photo to his friends after they broke off their romance. With what would you guess police charged the boyfriend?

Well, nothing.

It was the boyfriend, actually, who very well may have committed an actual crime by disseminating child pornography, but law enforcement agencies came up with a cool game of "Pass the Buck," in order to spare him punishment. At least that's what appears to have happened. The Erie County Sheriff's office can't come up with a charge because they just aren't sure where the boy was when he forwarded the child pornography to his friends. Nifty. He gets a pass on a pretty clear and serious violation of the law, and the girl gets charged under a very flexible state law.

What's wrong with this picture?

If police and prosecutors wanted to charge the boy, they could, I guess, but it looks like they just don't want to do that. A Register reporter has been asking about this for more than a month now, and I suspect they thought we'd eventually just quit asking. Sheriff's deputies say they just aren't sure where the boyfriend was living when he sent out the photo, as if he sent it from a land line. Makes no sense. Where there was no crime they come up with a charge, and where there likely is a real crime they duck. I'm not advocating they hammer the boyfriend to the maximum, but giving him a pass with lame "jurisdictional" issues is just a load of ... It was a cell phone, for God's sake, not a land line. They might be able to get the cell phone records and pinpoint the exact location from where he forwarded the photos. But that's not the real issue, that's just the excuse.

Throw the book at him and plead it down to disorderly conduct, another one of those perfectly flexible laws police and prosecutors rely upon. If police don't do that, you got to wonder, just how sexist is our society where women get charged where no crime is committed and men get a "jurisdictional pass" because our boys in blue just ... just ... what exactly?

I don't know. But this is one for the record books.



Wow Matt, if you want to blog about sexist laws why don't you investigate how sexist child custody and divorce law is sexist.  There is no other law so biased against men than this area of law.  Women routinely get a free pass during a divorce.  Even when there is proof of an indescretion, etc, the woman always walks away with half of the marital assets and alimony to boot.  Divorce law is one area where the woman can do no wrong, and if the man does wrong they lay the pipe to him.  It is just as bad when it comes to child custody.  In only the rarest of cases is the father ever awarded custody of his children.  It doesn't matter whether the mother has a pot to piss in or whether she is a fit parent.  She gets the kids simply by the fact that she is alive.  So really, if you want to talk about how the law is unfair, why not look at the judicial system in its totality instead of one particular incident.