A bulldozer is a happy machine

nick
Mar 23, 2010

What if we just bulldozed everything that was for rent for more than a year?

We'd make exceptions, of course, for buildings of particular historical or architectural value, but that should be a relatively short list.

But otherwise, what if when driving around Sandusky, wherever you now see an abandoned building, you saw an empty lot? A well maintained empty building looks like a sad orphan, one that hasn't been restored — especially one that bears witness to the architectural sins of the latter half of the 20th century, or was built using the disposable construction methods that became deriguer in recent years — looks more like a bad day in Beirut.

An empty lot on the other hand, maybe covered with wild grass, maybe even with a tree or a wildflower or something, looks at least vaguely pleasant. And if you're in a community that doesn't have for sale/for lease signs in half the windows because the supply of space has far out-stripped demand, then an empty lot looks like an opportunity.

You could even restrict for sale signs on empty lots. Make people feel like people might actually want the land. Every for sale sign, when they reach critical mass, starts to read, "warning, danger, put your money here only if you're tired of money and would prefer never to see it again..."

Obviously, land-owners would have to be compensated and funds would have to be found somewhere (prolly from the taxpayers) for that and for bulldozing. Then of course, there's all that new lawn to mow...

These are hurdles, but they seem surmountable to me. Especially so since I'm willing to bet that the hidden costs to the community as a whole for maintaining all this unused property must outstrip the costs of simply adjusting the supply to match reality.

Maybe I'm late to this party and barking up the wrong tree. Maybe this has already been suggested, studied, and rejected because it didn't make sense. Maybe it's already been suggested and rejected out of hand because it was politically untenable. (Of course my definition of political leadership is not simply achieving what is already politically feasible, but by identifying what we need to do and finding a way to make it politically possible.)

But maybe its just the kind of wacky, radical program a city like Sandusky needs.

Comments

freddiecoffey

While that is a radical and ultimately pie-in-the-sky idea... think of the positive effect it would have on the supply-demand structure for both residential and commercial real estate markets (not to mention the beutification of the city with added green space).

While I loved the city of Sandusky when I lived there and do miss it often, one thing I certainly don't miss is the all to common site of those for sale signs and the crippling depression that viewing them emotes. Its almost a polar opposite from the Cleveland area where there's been so much progress in the conversion of empty, dilapidated warehouses into upscale loft apartments and entertainment complexes that have given rise to the burgeoning culinary scene.

Sandusky has always had the potential of becoming a desireble lakeside resort community, but it also has always seemed to lack direction. Perhaps if the blighted properties in the city were bulldozed, the clean slate would give rise to that potential that so many have always hoped for.

Huron2009

Huron City Council embraces the idea of signs everywhere.  According to the 6/24/2009 Sandusky Register:

Law director Terry Griffith said city officials recently received a complaint about signs on Cleveland Road and decided to suspend enforcing the ban.

It doesn't pay to complain to city officials in Huron, they will just do the opposite.  We have an opportunity to elect 5 of 7 councilmembers this November. 

www.Huron2009.blogspot.com

 

Karl Hungus-Mr....

Freddie makes a good point, however, the potential of Sandusky becoming a desireable lakeside resort community means that our city leaders need to stop selling the shoreline off to the highest bidder with the biggest pipedream.  Instead they should be developing the shoreline into an attractive destination that welcomes and invites the public. 

PolarBear70

Yeah let's just trample rights of all property owners.  Wow what a concept!!!

reader

Is that a bulge outward in the Cooke building   ( the old Holzaphael sporting goods store ) on Columbus Ave?    Just under the E on the second floor level...... I wonder if this building is safe ?

The city has ignored the deplorable condition of buildings in the central business district.  There is no excuse for plywood covered windows on the upper floors of buildings on our main street.