What this information is supposed to mean, I'm not sure because it's a non-answer to serious questions about the overall cost of the Nuesse debacle.
From the city's website:
If this is supposed to make people feel like the city is easing up the information lockdown, it's not working.
In early March, Jason Singer asked these questions of the commission and they went unanswered.
They remain unanswered:
Just my perspective: The reason the city is trying to hide this information is because the consensus around town is that the money was foolishly spent.
And you gotta love this part underlined in yellow:
The facts behind Nuesse's sexual harassment suit against Kline have nothing to do with the "facts" Kline used to fire her. That's spin.
And now for a word from our sponsors:
Voiceover: This litigation brought to you by city manager Matthew I-Admit-That-I-Put-My-Hands-On-Nuesse's-Shoulders-But-It-Was-Not-Meant-To-Be-Demeaning-Or-Paternalistic Kline.
Comments
My comments will be brief. Any person that refuses to answer questions or evades questions tells me that they are hiding something. As always, only my opinion