Sandusky's only local TV station

nick
Mar 23, 2010

I don't know if you've noticed, but we've got a new video player, with a whole new "Video" page on this site.

It was a lot of work for us, but we're excited about it because it gives us both some new storytelling options and some new usability features. It gives us both a single page to watch all our video and the ability to embed videos right in the text stream of individual stories, something that I think is the next step in online storytelling. Plus, we think it's easier to use.

But all that doesn't matter unless our users -- you -- like it.

So tell me, what do you think?

Comments

Anonymous

Why are there x's on some of these stories and we can't comment because there is no code number when this happens?

Anonymous

Why is there a red "x" verification on some stories and on others, there aren't any? Why not have verification on all of the stories?

Anonymous

tt doens't like to answer other people's questions, especially the tough ones.

Anonymous

Yep, especially when I had documented facts to back up my claims and he just kept running his mouth (or, shall we say fingers) and could not back up anything he said.

Anonymous

I don't know. Usually I do provide answers to everything I'm asked. While I'll cede in "I Believe's" case, I don't think that whether or not this new toy of White's is any good is of any consequence in the face of many others. Before you puff out your chest though, I Believe, don't forget your rather amusing backpedaling in your "debate" (read: mostly monologue) with Common Sense. You're no master, either, and I'm not the only one who found your harassment of Common Sense (when you were begging him/her to come back and give you attention) to be somewhat commical. As for "about...," I wonder as to which comment you've chosen to post anything of consequence. It seems like you're only here working in tandem with "I Believe..." to bash me. Since you're obviously wrong about me, why don't you pick an easier target, i.e. someone equal to your intellect?

Anonymous

To "I Believe":

Do you really have so much trouble staying on a topic that you "hunt" people down on othe sites to comment to them? In our last conversation, I asked if you were stalking me and you assured me you weren't. Now, I wonder if you do this to bloggers just so you can have the last word. Comin on to this forum just to resurrect a battle with tt is not very Christian. If this is how you promote your Christian values, it may be time to talk with your priest again.

Common Sense

I did not enjoy the videos prior to your new system as I did not want to "hear" all the chit-chat. I prefer to read the newspaper, not hear it. I still prefer to read everything her. It's just my opinion...nothing else.

Anonymous

To Common Sense and tt:

For the record: I have not posted anything under "I Believe" since April 18 on the other article (which is when I "buried the hatchet" on the whole issue). The person below is an imposter trying to either make me look bad or stir up trouble or both. This is one of the reasons why I think the SR needs to have bloggers register (no pun intended) or have sign in. Although it's not really ID theft, in a small way I feel as if someone has stolen part of my ID, and that pi$$es me off! I know it happens on this site more than it should (it's happened to me twice before).

I am done with "I Believe" as a user name (and have been done), so any further posts under that name just disregard because it's just some a$$ trying to start something.

Common Sense

to the real "I Believe":

When this happens to me, I write back calling myself the original Common Sense.
I am glad to hear that you did not seek out tt on another post.
I hope that we will meet again and may God bless you.
P.S. I'm sorry to be off-topic.

Anonymous

Come on Nick, it's been almost 2 weeks now that this column has been up. How about a new one. Come on Nick....chop, chop....let's get typing....

If you need some suggestions for a new topic, feel free to call me! :)

Anonymous

What happened to the Forums?

Common Sense

Now, there's a topic for the Interactive Media Director to really sink his teeth into this week. It is truly amazing how readers of this blog can find your topics without even trying and yet it takes you a considerable time to find a fresh start, say, every two weeks.

Anonymous

the player should only start when I press the play button. That would be best.

Anonymous

O Nick....Nick.....Nick........Where are you....are you.....are you........

Wow, it must be really empty in there. Over 2 weeks and no new column.

Anonymous

It's rather obvious that Nick is nothing more than a child in journalism. The main reason for this is Matt probably needed a playmate at the register. Matt probably pays Nick in tokens for Goofy Golf's Arcade instead of paying him with real money for trying to do a real job. Those of you that ask where he is at should remember as Nick is aquiring his insight to journalism, rest assured that Matt probably has Nick cleaning the toilets at the Register to justify his play thing. Something to ponder for sure!!

Anonymous

To think, we all could be collecting a paycheck from the Register, too. But of course, we'd have to stop coming up with relevant and thought-provoking material, and we'd have to stop any work that didn't entail simply sitting on our hind-ends. Nick, how do you do it? Sleep at night, I mean? Better yet, WHY do you still insist on being on staff when you do less than everyone else? (which is saying something)

Anonymous

You've got it all wrong buddy. Nick is the son of one of the paper's owners. He can't be fired, and thus doesn't need to do any work. If anything, he makes Matt scrub HIS toilet while he and Doug Phares are out drinking scotch. Nepotism at its best... yet again another good 'ol boy network in Sandusky.

Anonymous

Oh I get it, he was born with the proverbial golden spoon in the sphincter ani!! How sweet.

Anonymous

tt: Mr. OCD is still attempting to control the board huh?

Remember: YOU are the entertainment.

Keep up those wondrous "thought-provoking" comments and someday, yes someday; you might just collect a stipend for your performance in the theater of the mind.

Anonymous

Looks like the troll has come out of his cave again long enough to be a PUBLIC hypocrite again. You write with all the authority, skill, and timeliness of Nick White: are you two one and the same? Again, with the "OCD?" Weren't you put in your place the last few times you decided to trot out that old piece of libelous garbage? Don't you have any original material? If I "intimidate" you (read: put you in your place - AGAIN) here again, will you cry? You're such an easy target: ad hominenms without basis usually lose their sting quickly, by the way.

Anonymous

Your attacks also lose credibility, Sage, when you attack me personally and me alone. I'm far from the only poster here, and I'm far from the most frequent poster here. Is it possible that you're still smarting at something, Sage? How unbecoming.

Anonymous

WILL YOU PEOPLE STOP POSTING ON THIS ARTICLE! ! ! Don't you realize that if you keep posting, o'le Nick thinks he doesn't have to write another column. We need him to work, work, work and as long as we post, he won't do any work (because all he does for the SR is write this column).

- The Staff of Sandusky Register

Anonymous

Why did the comments criticizing Nick get deleted? Somebody's feewings get hurt?

Pages