Teenage mother arrested

Girl, 14, allegedly throws car seat, beats mother and sister with dowel
Alissa Widman Neese
Oct 3, 2013


Police arrested a teenaged mother Tuesday night after she allegedly threw a car seat at family members and hit them repeatedly with a plastic mini blinds dowel.

The girl, 14, became enraged when her mother held her 8-month-old son, despite her mother having custody of the child, according to a Sandusky police report.

The girl lives with her sister, 26, in the 2400 block of Pioneer Trail, where the incident occurred. Their mother lives in Kentucky with the girl’s baby and brought him to visit the pair Tuesday.

Before Tuesday’s brawl, the girl accidentally pinched her son’s finger in his crib, making him cry, according to the report. When her mother consoled the baby instead of letting the girl hold him, they began arguing. Her sister tried to break up the fight, which quickly turned violent.

During the scuffle, the girl started punching her sister and whipping her with a plastic dowel used to adjust mini blinds, injuring her fingers, according to the report. She then chucked a car seat at her mother.

The girl’s mother pinned her on her bed, and the girl allegedly kicked her multiple times in the stomach.

Police arrived at about 10:30 p.m. and broke up the fight. They restrained the girl, who yelled and flailed her arms until they threatened to charge her with resisting arrest, according to the report. She claimed she was trying to defend herself because her mother and sister “jumped on her” and hit her.

The girl calmed down, and police cited her with two counts of domestic violence and one count of unruly juvenile. They took her to the Erie County Detention Center, per the center’s request.


Seen it All

14 and has a 8 month old baby? YIKES!


Oh boy, not if sure where to start with this one !! Ready, Set, Go people and let the debate begin!! lol


Mandatory chastity belts and 24/7 supervision at age 10 until age of 21.

Or NO Welfare Bennies at all.


We can't make chastity belts mandatory, but we could teach about pregnancy prevention or abstinence. Supervision is one thing but children rebel to too much if locked up in a too strict environment. At some point you have to trust your children to make the right decisions and usually if you have taught them right from wrong, they do fine.

Licorice Schtick

Not so good when children have children.


I give it about 5 minutes before Ms.Psych comes on here and starts playing the race card (despite the fact that no race is mentioned in the story) and saying we all need to "back off and give this fine young mother another chance -- people can change blah blah blah" Sick of scum like this -- so glad my tax dollars can go toward raising the 8 month old daughter of a 14 year old girl!

Here's the real question -- why is a 20 year old and her 14 year old sister living in Ohio while their mother lives in Kentucky?? Maybe if mom were around, 14 year old wouldn't have her own little troll already.


Please DO NOT mention me on discussions that I have not spoken on, that's the first thing. Second thing, I could care less about whether this girl, her sister, and her mother are black, white, etc..etc.. there is no racial issue concerning this story, only the issues of TEEN PREGNANCY/PARENTHOOD, and VIOLENT BEHAVIOR concern this article = what does race have to do with THIS?? SO... why did YOU just bring anything about race up? Once again, another person on here displaying THEIR lack of intelligence. Oh, and speaking of tax dollars, do YOU even have a job cause I see you posted this up at 2:43PM, you can't POSSIBLY be working a regular 9-5 job like the rest of us taxpayers, otherwise you wouldn't have had time in your busy work day to chime in on this article and mention ME! LoL wow, the nerve of some people!!!!


Drop dead liberal loon.


Not too smart are you? What would the world be if we all worked 9\5 ? Some of us work for the UAW and have different hours and make more than you honey! It's called skilled trade! 1st 2nd 3rd shifts tend to be 6am-2pm 2pm-10pm 10m-6pm so stfu and educate yourself more!


Don't waste your time with this nut case -- I shouldn't have mentioned his/her name -- it's my fault.


I don't give a Da*m about any of that, I said what I said about the commenter not working to be a smart-a** MORON!Or, don't YOU get sarcasm?? AND how much money I make is neither here, nor there, I make enough to support myself and keep a HOUSE and pay MY bills, SO....What exactly is YOUR point? MY point was, there was ABSOLUTELY NO REASON for the commenter to speak on ME in his/her post.......PERIOD! Because I had nothing to do with the discussion (prior to that person's comment)now how about YOU STFU?


No I can't tell sarcasm throw your bipolar rant......Maybe that is your problem you make enough too support yourself....maybe you should shrive for a little bit more that just getting by to support your habit? Just a thought. BTW if someone made a comment about me on here there is no way that I would know and be able to respond that fast. So you defiantly look for trouble on here a little more than you think you do..... You really have "issues" Not just social media issues but real life (you need to get checked out) issues!


It's called a white-collar job -- I have a computer at my desk, Sweetheart LOL

This story has nothing to do with race, which was exactly my point -- you always run in and start throwing the race card. Thanks for taking the bait, kiddo!


Exactly, you have a computer at your work desk, yet you were doing no actual work, which is obvious because you were on SanduskyRegister.com commenting and putting my name within a discussion that should not have had anything to do with me at all. Do your work, like the rest of us HARD-WORKING taxpayers do, instead of wasting time, ON YOUR JOB, worrying about whether I will comment on these discussion boards!


Oh, and by the way, in the past year, I have commented on ONE article in this paper (now two because I am commenting on this one), SO, please tell me how is it that I ALWAYS throw the "race card" around, when I have only commented on that other article? Please explain this to me, and show me proof of where I have ALWAYS done this? You can't possibly be grown, because your comments are quite child-like.


At my job, I deal with pieces of scum like you and the winners mentioned in this story -- in between clients, I have to kill some time -- soooo, I come on here and vent a little bit. I don't take cigarette breaks because I don't smoke, So I take Sandusky Register breaks LOL

Looks like somebody is getting a little worked up over this. It's not worth my time to dig through old stories and provide the proof you're looking for. I've got more important things to do.

You know what I find really funny about this?? You're the one that comes on here and defends people with criminal records a mile long, saying "they can change" and "be nice to them -- they made a mistake", yet all you want to do is put me down for my opinions. What about me -- can't I change?? LOL You're out of your mind -- your screen name is appropriate -- Ms.Psychward.


Where exactly did I put YOU down? I simply told you NOT to mention MY NAME in YOUR posts, especially since I had nothing to do with THIS discussion when you FIRST made the choice to mention me!

Spy's picture

I don't think it is healthy for you to post here. So what, someone doesn't like you don't take it so personally you only make them happier that they can make you rage.


@state.... I can agree on one thing here....a 14 year old should NOT have an 8 month old baby...but my question to you is...Why do you AUTOMATICALLY assume that this baby is being raised by YOUR tax dollars!?!?.....If the girls mother is taking care of the baby, she COULD be working to take care of that baby!!....People just assume that people get government assistance no matter what the situation is!!..I get soooo tired of hearing you people whine about YOUR tax dollars!!!...Do you know that your tax dollars are paying for waaaay more than food stamps and medical assistance!?!?....YOUR tax dollars are paying for unnecessary state and federal things!!.. And what about tax time every year??...Are YOU one of the higher class people who doesn't get any of YOUR taxes back because you make too much money, because most people get back what they pay in or more after earned income credit every year! ...Also, to call a baby a "troll" is just pure ignorance!!....That baby didn't ASK to be brought into this world....Geese people..come ON!!

nosey rosey

Wow! Who knew that most people get all of their taxes back every year? I certainly don't and I definately don't make "too much money".


Imalley either A.)lives in a fantasy land or B.)he/she lives off of our tax dollars too ;-)


Who gets all their taxes back????? LIV

Concerned For A...

Stupid is as stupid does. People that make "too much money" to get any tax money back also fund people who get back everything they paid in plus "earned income credit". Those who make too much worked their a$$es off to get where they are in life, therefore deserve credit for it. All liberals cry for these "less fortunate folk". WHY?? They could go to school for FREE (free for them) and better themselves so they too could make too much money, but decide to sit on their arse and complain about being poor and hard working Americans not giving them enough to live on!There are plenty of ways for people to get out of poverty, plenty of grants for them to get an education that a huge majority of "entitlement" receivers choose not to utilize! That is why people who pay into these programs every year get so angry! Because these people just choose to stay on assistance and are fine with living that way! A girl I know has 5 children, she gets 800 dollars a month in food stamps, free medical care for all children and herself, government housing, why the hell would she look for a job!!! Everything is handed to her!!And people like her sell half their food stamps for cash! People like her are exactly why people who "make too much" "whine" as you call it, it's bull!! Anyways, that was quite off subject, the point regarding this article is that the girl is 14 yrs old, and lives with her sister in the ghetto, instead of either of her parents, and has an 8 month old child that she can't take care of because she is still a baby herself. MAYBE, just MAYBE if this girl had any type of parental guidance in her life, she might be worried about band, volleyball, basketball or cheerleading, or her schooling instead of getting pregnant at 14. Obviously the mother didn't do that great of a job parenting her, is she raising another teen mom or dad? Time will tell.


LOL go ahead and keep you head burried in the sand kiddo -- the world is an ugly place -- this family sounds like a bunch of winners -- Mom living in Kentucky, 20 year old daughter and 14 year old daughter living in Ohio, Grandma raising the 14 year old's daughter -- sounds like a great situation to me! I bet they've all got well paying jobs and they support themselves 100%! LOL Riiiiiiight.

What world do you live in that you get all of your tax dollars back?? Uncle Sam takes more money out of my paycheck to support people like these jokers than I care to talk about. But go ahead -- stay ignorant and keep giving humanity the benefit of the doubt -- in the meantime, society will continue to go up in flames! CheerSs!


Bet they get free obamacare too!


Another dumbass, lol


"During the scuffle, the girl started punching her sister and whipping her with a plastic dowel used to adjust mini blinds" - It's called a TILT WAND people. Thanks.

Simple Enough II



Obviously the family has some problems but to assume they are scum and that your tax dollars are supporting them is ignorant. The grandmother has custody of the baby thank goodness as 14 is way too young to raise a child. She may have failed in the pregnancy prevention talk but she is wise enough to take the child and care for it properly. This teenager obviously has anger issues and does not get along with her mother so she is where she belongs. The baby is not a troll and hopefully will turn out better than mom.

Seen it All

How can you believe she is "caring for it properly"? Like she did with the 14 yr old who is already a mother WITH anger issues? I would venture to guess that mommy dearest aka grandma has custody because one of her meal tickets already aged out and the other fast approaching. Just my educated guess.


Thank you for joining me in being the voice of reason.

Simple Enough II

I agree.

Simple Enough II

I agree.


The grandmother needs to stay in Kentucky with the baby and stay away from the babies mother. It won't be long and the girl will end up pregnant again. What a sad situation! But , I would venture to say that there is a lot of welfare money going into all of their pockets.




The baby should be put up for adoption. Some wonderful drama free family would love to have a baby to raise! Poor baby!


Real quick, the article says the sister was 26 not 20. And the teen has a son not a daughter. If you're gonna throw your judgements around because you're perfect, then at least be correct with the facts. ;)


The Timbers.. nuff said


Yep, and not only IF the people who lived out there, BUT also the realty company (W-T)gave two hoots about that community out there, maybe it wouldn't have such a "bad name" for itself, because a LONG time ago it wasn't like that out there. I think that it is unfortunate that because of the many bad things that go on and and some of the negative/troublesome people that live out there, the decent people that do reside out there, get stigmatized. W-T needs to CLEAN IT UP, meaning they need to stop letting ANY and EVERYBODY move in out there AND on Remington Ave. - by doing REAL background checks on the people they allow to move in, because I know that they don't really care who moves in, as long as you have the security deposit and first months rent and/or Section 8 for THOSE particular apartments, you're in there!


Those Apartments have been crap since day one....don't blame the owners of a property that is out to make money....you have to follow certain laws to be on section 8 first of all! WT Realty does background checks and what they can to try to root out the the wonderful people of sandusky but who else wants to live out there really think about it just a little bit stupid is as stupid does if they don't like the neighborhood move! or blame the landlord Hey! Sounds like Bobbie Jo has kicked you out before!


Bobbie Jo? Do you mean Bobbie Sue? Wow, you're ignorant! I lived out there for 8 years, until I became able to afford my own HOUSE. Bobbie Sue, ISN'T the landlord, NOR does SHE own the property, which therefore means nothing I said has anything to do with her, SHE just does her job as she is told to, whether it's right or whether it's wrong.... However, I know for a fact that there are people who live out there right now, that IF a REAL background check was done on them, they wouldn't be living there, just as well as certain people that live in the Remington Ave. apartments. Speak what you ACTUALLY know about. Waldock(the actual OWNERS)don't give two squats about that neighborhood, nor the interior of the buildings and apartments that is why Pioneer Trail and Maple Square (Remington Ave.) are the ONLY Waldock apartments that allow Section 8 - They do "enough" to keep their apartments out there Section 8 approved. And, as I stated, good, decent, law abiding, NON-Section 8 tenants that live out there still are stigmatized for living in a neighborhood, that IF it was kept up, and "cleaned out" would not have the "bad name" that is attached to it!


Never said Bobbie owned it ..... WT stands for Waldock and Tone.....think about it.....but Waldocks bought Tones out years ago....so you know so much.....and to not give to squats about it .... kinds funny when they have a huge maintanise crew...... Really what to you want to get for $350 a month...Sorry I never had to have section 8.....I pay my own bills I just worked for them....and sorry I forgot her full name lmao! I remember driving by before WT owned it and there was no lighting on Remington and all the nice crowds that would run into the streets......yeah they brought it down.......But I'm sure you want to pay $350 and live in a mansion with your Obama phone too......I'm sorry.....I normally don't talk to Obama voters but when I do I ASK FOR A SIDE OF FRIES!


I'm craving a good donut


Ok, are we all missing something here?? First of all it's a 14 year old girl, where is daddy and was he charged with rape and put in jail? Why isn't the girl living with her mother instead of her sister, was she living with sissy when she got pregnant or with mommy?
Contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Think grandma ought to take baby and go back to Kentucky out of this mess.


Thank for bringing up the issue of male irresponsibility and the fact that the fourteen old girl was the victim of a rape. There's a lot of hostility directed to the females in this story (most of it from males I suspect) but none directed to the culture that encourages males to objectify and devalue females.

Here's an idea: Male reproductive biology is a lot simpler than female biology. How about research directed to readily reversible vasectomies so that males can't impregnate females until they are willing to accept fatherhood or better yet are married to the mother. (what a quaint notion). In other words we as a society do not allow males to become fathers until they are financially and emotionally capable of supporting their children and are shown to value females.

Licorice Schtick

And if the father is 14, did they rape each other? And you seem to be advocating mandatory "reversable" sterilization, but just for males? At what age? The gender bias displayed here is ridiculous.


It's highly doubtful the father was also 14 years old. And yes I am proposing that research be directed to easily reversible sterilization of males because male biology is easier to modify without long term impact and males need to be held accountable in some way for indiscriminate reproduction.

It's a fact that in the biological world sperm is cheap while eggs are valuable. Check out what high quality female eggs are worth to infertile couples $25,000 to $50,000 while a male sperm donor with similar credentials may get $500.00. Females as a rule are not hard wired to reproduce indiscriminately while males are designed to spread it around. Society use to have rules that discouraged females from having children out of wedlock or held the males responsible. In other words you had children you could afford.

And yes the gender bias displayed here is ridiculous. You excuse male misbehavior, and discount the very highly likely fact that this girl was raped in all likelihood because she's female.


Babies having babies. You would think someone would have explained sexual responsibility and birth control to her at this age, but apparently not. The mother is living in Kentucky and she lives here with her sister....NOT a good thing. She should go back to Kentucky with Mommy and learn some responsibility, especially since she has a child. Why let her stay here with her sister and play any more than she already has? No, no, no. Mother needs to be responsible for daughter first....THEN daughter can be responsible for child.

This kids don't learn by example that is the main problem. They have learned by an entire group of people who have the idea that they are "entitled" and that is a problem. They haven't learned any responsible behavior and until they do, this is what we have running the streets. So who is going to teach them those skills? Heaven only knows? I hope some of them learn it in the school courses of "life skills" they have now. One can only pray.

Licorice Schtick

So that's the problem? Not enough prayer? And here I thought was that working-class families can't support a household on a single income, so even "reponsible" families, with both parents resident, are forced to leave teenagers, fertile and awash in hormones, unsupervised for several hours each day.


Everyone is entitled to an "oops". But, with the next little bundle of joy created by this birthing machine and her random sperm donor the benefits to support this child should be cut 25%. Each additional love child created by this young person the benefits are cut an additional 25%.

Folks its about money with this entitlement hog. Take away the incentive for more money and the legs will close.

Licorice Schtick

Dream on. She was awash in hormones, and also 100% sure she was in love. Just because you're all about money doesn't mean a teenage girl is.

"It's easier to guard a sack of fleas than a girl in love." - Jewish proverb

Teenagers need supervision. All. The. Time.


Perhaps you are the one dreaming? Awash in on line images of underage teenage girls all longing for you? Now there's a fantasy. All teenage girls really want it.

How do you propose to supervise female and male teenagers all the time in a culture that promotes and glorifies the sexuality of teenagers?

The New World Czar

The 14 year old is now a resident at the Juvie Center...then what, turn her back over to the sister or back to Kentucky?

Please, give the small child a chance in life and put him up for adoption.


mandatory birth control, proof you can financially raise a child, adoption, we are just fanning the flames of irresponsibility, tough ,yes , change always is.