Perry sending National Guard troops to border

Deployment will cost Texas an estimated $12M a month to combat criminals that some say are exploiting a surge of children and families entering the U.S. illegally
Associated Press
Jul 22, 2014

Gov. Rick Perry said Monday he is deploying up to 1,000 National Guard troops over the next month to the Texas-Mexico border to combat criminals that Republican state leaders say are exploiting a surge of children and families entering the U.S. illegally.

Perry, a vocal critic of the White House's response to the border crisis — and who is mulling a second presidential run in 2016 — said the state has a responsibility to act after "lip service" from the federal government.

He rejected suggestions that Texas was militarizing local communities by putting National Guard troops on the ground or that crime data along the border doesn't justify additional resources.

The deployment will cost Texas an estimated $12 million a month. Texas Adjutant General John Nichols said his troops would simply be "referring and deterring" immigrants and not detaining people — though Nichols said the National Guard could if asked.

"We think they'll come to us and say, 'Please take us to a Border Patrol station," Nichols said.

More than 3,000 Border Patrol agents currently work in the region, and Perry has repeatedly asked Obama to send the National Guard to the border. Much of the area has been overwhelmed in recent months by tens of thousands of unaccompanied children illegally entering the U.S.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection didn't respond to a request for comment Monday.

As governor, Perry is commander in chief of Texas military forces unless those forces have already been mobilized by the White House. But if Perry deploys National Guard troops it is up to Texas to pay for them, while an order from Obama would mean Washington picks up the tab.

"Gov. Perry has referred repeatedly to his desire to make a symbolic statement to the people of Central America that the border is closed," said White House spokesman Josh Earnest. "And he thinks that the best way to do that is to send 1,000 National Guard troops to the border. It seems to me that a much more powerful symbol would be the bipartisan passage of legislation that would actually make a historic investment in border security and send an additional 20,000 personnel to the border."

Earnest also said the White House hasn't received the kind of "formal communication" with Perry's office that usually accompanies such deployments.

President George W. Bush sent 6,000 National Guard troops to the border in 2006, and Obama eventually extended that deployment while ordering a second wave of National Guard forces to Texas, California, Arizona and New Mexico in 2010. But the second round saw reduced numbers of troops, and most of their work was limited to air patrols in counterdrug operations.

Perry announced last month that Texas would steer another $1.3 million each week to the Department of Public Safety to assist in border security through at least the end of the year. In a letter to Obama on June 20, Perry made several requests for help along the border, including 1,000 National Guard troops, additional helicopters and giving troops "arrest powers to support Border Patrol operations until sufficient Border Patrol resources can be hired, trained and deployed to the border."

It's not clear why Perry would need the Obama administration to authorize arrest powers and the governor's office has not offered details ahead of the announcement. Texas law simply states that the governor can "adopt rules and regulations governing enlistment, organization, administration" of the Texas State Guard.

In a White House letter to Perry on July 7, Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett laid out steps the administration was taking to deal with what the president had called an "urgent humanitarian situation," but did not mention the National Guard. Obama met with Perry two days later in Dallas, and the administration has worked with Mexico and other countries the immigrants are leaving to make it clear they will not be allowed to stay in the U.S.

On previous border deployments, National Guard soldiers have served in support roles — administrative, intelligence gathering — while the Border Patrol expanded its ranks. Some National Guard troops already participate in counter-drug operations on the border, though they don't have arrest powers.

Since October, more than 57,000 unaccompanied children and teenagers have entered the U.S. illegally — more than double compared to the same period a year earlier. Most have been from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, where rampant gang violence and intense poverty have driven tens of thousands of people outside their borders.

Their numbers overwhelmed Border Patrol facilities in the Rio Grande Valley, leading Perry and the Texas Department of Public Safety to argue that Border Patrol agents distracted by groups of children and families were leaving gaps.

Most of those children have been turning themselves in to the first person in a uniform they see.

 

Comments

There you go again

Thank you, Mr. Perry!

Contango

Re: "The deployment will cost Texas an estimated $12 million a month."

One of the reasons that The Republic of Texas joined the union in 1845 anyways was for help with the expense of border protection from Mexican incursion.

It's unfortunate that Texas isn't able to withhold tax dollars from DC.

Where's Mr. Obama today; at a fundraiser or golfing?

freespeech1

Obama for the next 3 days will be fundraising.

Dr. Information

Go figure. Our own president won't protect its borders and is more worried about playing pat butt with fellow losers.

The Big Dog's back

About time Texas spends some of that extra money returned by the Fed.

Blackberry Phale

Vous savez que vous êtes un putain d'idiot, non?

Darwin's choice

It's about time!

The failure in the white house allowing this to continue is pathetic!

obama/failing still

deertracker

Perry could have done this a long time ago. He wanted the federal government to do it so Texas would not have to deal with the cost and negative PR. The President told him this was an option available to him and urged him to use it. Texas is a welfare state. Pay your own way!

Contango

Re: "the cost and negative PR"

So why does U.S. Customs and Border Protection even exist?

"Negative PR"?

So the U.S. should just welcome the invasion?

http://www.cbp.gov/

----------------

FYI:

Pres. Obama will meet with Central American leaders on Friday.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/1...

Pres. Obama: Guys I gotta go. I've got a fundraiser to get to.

Dr. Information

deers post are more bogus day after day. Why even have a president if he won't do anything about anything? Why have borders? Our president is a puss and everyone knows it.

deertracker

Why have a governor if he won't do anything?

Contango

Re: "Why have a governor if he won't do anything?"

Correction: Why have a president if he won't do anything?

Gov. Perry is.

Dr. Information

Why deer? Why spend billions a year on border agents...etc. Why deer, why have a president that does nothing? He is Barrack I do nothing Obama, thats why.

deertracker

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K...
READ IT AND COMPREHEND!!!!!!

Blackberry Phale

C'est ce que j'appelle «la logique libérale". Tatillonne choses sans importance pour nuire à des idées les plus importantes.

knowitall

Spending money on the wrong stuff is foolish. What IS the right thing to do with whatever money is available? I am guessing the border states might know better how to stop folks from entering the US illegally.

Gottathink

Plus.
It's the federal government's job to protect the nations borders.

deertracker

Pres. Obama: Guys do your job. You have the power to protect your border so protect it!

Contango

Re: "You have the power to protect your border so protect it!"

So why does U.S. Customs and Border Protection even exist?

So what's the expense of protecting the border of DC from MD or VI?

Dr. Information

@contango. Don't expect a legit response. These loons on this site are great deflect and spinners.

Contango

Re: "deflect and spinners,"

It's just their Obama anal-brain probe blogging. Like trying to converse with a mindless machine, i.e. Obamabot.

deertracker

Texas does not need Obama to secure it's borders. They can do it themselves. Pay for it yourself moochers!

Dr. Information

So why was Obama on TV last week asking for (edit: Its actually 3.7 billion) 2 billon for the borders? You lose again deer.

deertracker

Texas is a welfare state. That's why doc!

Contango

Re: "Pay for it yourself"

Answer the questions:

So why does U.S. Customs and Border Protection even exist?

So what's the expense of protecting the border of DC from MD or VI?

Dr. Information

More proof Contango that liberals will do and say anything to protect Obama, even if that means putting this nation at a huge security risk (exactly what he is doing).

deertracker

MOOCHERS!!!!!!!

lonestarbuckeye

haha moochers huh? Have you ever been to Texas? It's a thriving economy that has brought people from all over the US.

The Big Dog's back

Texas wants to secede so bad, here's your chance.

Blackberry Phale

Vous savez que vous êtes un putain d'idiot, non?

Pages