Touch and go on Bergdahl release until very end

Soldier was apparently disillusioned with the war and left his post
Associated Press
Jun 3, 2014

Right up until the moment Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl was freed, U.S. officials weren't sure the Taliban would really release the only American soldier held captive in Afghanistan in exchange for high-level militants detained at Guantanamo Bay.

It was touch and go. But then came the call at 5:12 p.m. Saturday on a secure phone line at the U.S. Embassy in Doha, Qatar. U.S. negotiators learned that Bergdahl, a 28-year-old from Hailey, Idaho, held by the Taliban for nearly five years, was aboard a Delta Force helicopter bound for a U.S. base north of Kabul.

Bergdahl's release has hardly been a straightforward yellow-ribbon moment for the U.S. Bergdahl apparently was disillusioned with the war and left his post. The decision to free him in exchange for five top Taliban officials who have been held in the U.S. detention center in Cuba has raised questions about whether such a swap was too big a concession to make.

According to a State Department official directly involved in the negotiations in Doha, U.S. officials who had holed up in the embassy for three straight days thought the final days of negotiations with the Taliban's political leadership, through Qatari intermediaries, had gone pretty smoothly. The U.S. had gotten the Taliban to agree that the five detainees would be prohibited from traveling outside Qatar for a year after their release — something the Taliban earlier had opposed. In return, the U.S. agreed to release all five detainees at once, not one or two at a time as previously offered, in an effort to get Bergdahl back more quickly.

Still, the negotiators weren't positive the deal would work until they got the call that U.S. forces had the Army sergeant, who broke down and cried during the flight. After the call, the negotiators were emotional, too, he said.

"Backslapping was not how I would describe it," he said. "It wasn't like New Year's Eve. It was emotional, but not a giddy moment."

It's still unclear what the exact breakthrough moment was, but over lengthy negotiations the official said the talks gelled. Both sides wanted it to happen immediately before it could fall apart.

Details of the secret negotiations were described by the State Department official. But other information on the state of diplomacy between the Taliban, the U.S. and others was described by other current and former U.S. officials. None were authorized to speak about the deal publicly and spoke only on condition of anonymity. The negotiating team included two each from the State Department and the Pentagon, one from the White House national security staff and two from the U.S. Embassy in Doha.

President Barack Obama, in Europe for meetings with several nations' leaders and NATO officials, said Tuesday his administration had consulted with Congress about that possibility "for some time."

The prisoner swap idea had evolved in fits and starts since early 2011. The idea of an exchange was one of three confidence-building measures that were meant to open the door for the Afghan government to hold direct peace negotiations with the Taliban.

The goal was for the Taliban network to disassociate itself from international terrorism, which essentially required them to break ranks with al-Qaida, and open a political office in Qatar. In June 2013, the Taliban opened the office, adorning it with the same white flag flown during its five-year rule of Afghanistan that ended with the 2001 American-led invasion. Afghan President Hamid Karzai became incensed because he saw that as a Taliban effort to set up a government-in-exile. While the office never opened, Qatar proved a good place to have back-channel communication with the Taliban.

The State Department official, who spent the past 11 days in Doha helping guide the final round of negotiations to release Bergdahl, said that after the office-opening incident, the U.S. made it clear that it was amenable to indirect or direct talks with the Taliban.

In September 2013, the Taliban made an offer that appeared to be a request for direct talks about the Taliban detainees at Guantanamo Bay. The U.S. responded by seeking proof that Bergdahl was still alive. The Taliban released a video of Bergdahl in January.

A month later, however, the Taliban said they had suspended talks with the U.S. to exchange Bergdahl for the five Taliban officials. U.S. officials viewed it as a relatively mild rebuff and went to the Qataris to find out whether there still was the possibility of talks about the detainees. The Qataris agreed to act as an intermediary and after some consideration, the Taliban decided they were willing to talk.

No substantive discussion about terms of the swap occurred before both sides agreed to the latest talks, which started in late March or early April. U.S. officials were never in the same room with the Taliban leaders.

U.S. officials would talk to the Qataris, who would then contact the Taliban. Sometimes a couple of weeks would pass before U.S. officials would get a response from the Taliban on various issues involving the swap. In the few days leading up to Saturday's release, the communication became more frequent and the turnaround time was only a day.

U.S. officials did their negotiating in various Qatari government buildings — once changing venues because of broken air conditioning.

The State Department official said there was not a single breakthrough that allowed the swap to materialize, although U.S. officials believed that the Taliban's decision to accept the one-year travel ban for the released detainees was a large step forward. In earlier rounds of negotiations, the Taliban had always sought exemptions from the travel ban for medical purposes or other reasons.

The official said the detainees' activities will be limited in Qatar, an Arab emirate on the Persian Gulf, but that the conditions are not like house arrest. The five detainees, who are all in their 40s, received physicals upon arriving in Qatar on Sunday.

By last Wednesday morning, the U.S. negotiators had finalized the broad terms of the agreement. Then it was down to risky logistics of actually transferring Bergdahl in a war zone where both sides, who are fighting each other, had to be present.

Even on Saturday, up until the moment Bergdahl walked free, the U.S. negotiators were on the phone talking to the Taliban political leaders — through the Qataris — trying to prevent a misunderstanding from scuttling the deal.




Disillusioned or a Muslim sympathiser, in Hussain's world their both the same. Did you catch the smirk on his face when the defectors dad was speaking Muslim in the rose garden?


How do you speak Muslim?


The events taken in their entirety point toward severe malfeasance of office on the part of our Muslim (meaning anti-American) so called leader. The army deserter is unworthy of the lives of his six fellow servicemen who died while attempting to locate and rescue him. His father is also an anti American Muslim scumbag. It's time to start recognizing that the enemy is among us, and all the hand wringing about being nice that Americans do is just a wage of time, while the Taliban sharpen their knives for the big day.
Read the "TWEET" from this guy's father:


What is your problem with Muslims?

Little Giant

Just a couple of years ago you guys elected a deserter as President. Bush was AWOL during Vietnam and his daddy at the CIA made sure those records were destroyed.


Re:"Just a couple of years ago you guys elected a deserter as President. Bush was AWOL during Vietnam and his daddy at the CIA made sure those records were destroyed."

I do think that you must submit your proof to the proper persons as soon as possible so that they can be punished. If you do not have the proof then you should advise it is only your opinion.


You really need to show proof of your statement! Dan rather was run out of CBS for what u stated it was found to be false. Good try though


While neither are favorable, walking off a guard duty post in a war zone is much worse than hiding in a different country rather than going to war. Our deal for him was a bad deal. I am not a bush supporter, but at least he had the guts to know it wasn't for him, rather than put every person on that base in danger. Whether bergdahl was a deserter or wanted to explore, he should be punished severely.


W said he would have done the same thing.


Re: "W said he would have done the same thing."

Good to see the Obamabots chime in.

Where's your proof of your statement?


Would you want your son freed?

Hint: the answer is not on the back of a Kessler's bottle.


"W said he would have done the same thing."

You're delusional, dweeb.

Dr. Information

If my son abandoned his post and swore to bring violence to his supposed country and military. As tough as that pill would be to swallow, I'd say he gets what he deserves. He was a deserter and Obama just played the worse game of monopoly ever.

Bottom Line

This guy wasn't worth trading a washing machine for

Stop It

Most everyone thought we were getting a good guy back. Instead we got a p...o...s.


Deserter and traitor, they should return him and his anti American parents to the Taliban . Oh and pick up the Criminal and Chief take him too.

Stop It

What? All of a sudden those five terrorists are just gonna quit being terrorists after spending years in a USA military prison? What did we gain in this exchange?


The traitor-in-chief doesn’t care if these freed goons kill a few Americans.

I can hear Hitlery now, “what difference does it make?”


Those "freed goons" have not been found guilty of anything!


Please take your head out of obama's're embarrassing yourself!


Says the false prophet......................


Good to know your false prophet the messiah-in-chief told you the same thing. Probably not enough room up there with both you and coaster at the same time.

Don’t waste any time or energy telling yourself that your head should never have gotten up there in the first place, cause knowing you, it won’t be the last time.

Maybe you guys should switch off…or get the poor prez some K-Y Jelly.


You are a SINNER in the worst way!


So you are saying that they have that in common with those that obama droned... along with all those around the ones droned that were also killed? If so you are correct. Those who were droned were found guilty of nothing.


Could this set the table for a drone attack on US soil?


It's likely that those of you who feel this man is a deserter/traitor also view Ed Snowden as some type of hero-- If Obama is for it, you're against it.


Re: "Ed Snowden as some type of hero"

According to polls, about 40% of Dems view him as such.

Diane Feinstein has spoken out about this potential illegal trade of the five terrorists.

Pres. Obama says that we will monitor their actions. LMAO!!!!


Oh boy, someone ^^^^^^^^ is reading the back of a Kessler's bottle......AGAIN!


Re: "Oh boy, (snip)"

Take your own advice:
“You shouldn't waste your free speech on stupid comments!”

- deertracker, 5/28/14