White House, lawmakers: no clemency for Snowden

Intelligence committee heads say Snowden should have found another way to handle his concerns
Associated Press
Nov 4, 2013


The White House and the leaders of the congressional intelligence committees are rejecting former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden's plea for clemency.

"Mr. Snowden violated U.S. law," White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer said Sunday about the former systems-analyst-turned-fugitive who has temporary asylum in Russia.

"He should return to the U.S. and face justice," Pfeiffer said when pressed about whether clemency was being discussed.

Snowden made the plea in a letter given to a German politician and released Friday. In his one-page typed letter, he asks for clemency for charges over allegedly leaking classified information about the NSA to the news media. "''Speaking the truth is not a crime," Snowden wrote.

Snowden's revelations, among them allegations that the U.S. has eavesdropped on allies including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, have led to calls by allies to cease such spying and moves by Congress to overhaul U.S. surveillance laws and curb the agency's powers.

Bu the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee said if Snowden had been a true whistle-blower, he could have reported his concerns to her committee privately.

"That didn't happen, and now he's done this enormous disservice to our country," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. "I think the answer is no clemency."

The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Mike Rogers, called clemency for Snowden a "terrible idea."

"He needs to come back and own up," said Rogers, R-Mich. "If he believes there's vulnerabilities in the systems he'd like to disclose, you don't do it by committing a crime that actually puts soldiers' lives at risk in places like Afghanistan."

Rogers contended that Snowden's revelations had caused three terrorist organizations to change how they communicate.

Both lawmakers addressed word that President Barack Obama did not realize Merkel's personal phone was being tapped.

Rogers implied that he didn't believe the president, or European leaders who claimed they were shocked by Snowden's allegations.

"I think there's going to be some best actor awards coming out of the White House this year and best supporting actor awards coming out of the European Union," he said "Some notion that ... some people just didn't have an understanding about how we collect information to protect the United States to me is wrong."

Feinstein said she didn't know what the president knew, but said she intended to conduct a review of all intelligence programs to see if they were going too far.

"Where allies are close, tapping private phones of theirs ... has much more political liability than probably intelligence viability," she said.

Feinstein and Rogers been criticized for defending the NSA. Feinstein's committee produced a bill last week that she says increases congressional oversight and limits some NSA powers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Privacy advocates say the measure codifies the agency's rights to scoop up millions of American's telephone records.

Former NSA and CIA director Mike Hayden said it was possible Obama did not know about the alleged Merkel phone tapping.

But he said it was "impossible" that Obama's top staffers were unaware. "The fact that they didn't rush in to tell the president this was going on points out what I think is a fundamental fact: This wasn't exceptional. This is what we were expected to do."

Hayden's defense of the president comes days after he reportedly criticized the White House's handling of NSA revelations, when a former Democratic political operative tweeted snatches of Hayden's phone conversation, overheard on an Amtrak train.

Pfeiffer appeared on ABC's "This Week," while Rogers, Feinstein and Hayden were interviewed on CBS' "Face the Nation."


AJ Oliver

This AP story is blatent propaganda. Snowden did NOT ask for clemency in his letter. Read it and make up your own mind (Guardian web site). The New York Times came up with this lie first, but the AP reprinted it without doing the most basic fact checking. Be very skeptical of the main streal media !!!


The Snowden incident only helps to further illustrate the incompetency of the Obama Admin.


Okay, Snowden SHOULD have done things differently. The problem? Despite the mechanisms and protections in place for whistleblowers, those few who have stepped up to report wrongdoing or illegalities tend not to fare very well — and that's assuming they survive!

The Snowden case has educated all of us on several fronts: First, we know at least some of just how far the NSA has gone; and second, it's clear why he did what he did in the WAY that he did it.

Deal with the revelations, but it seems imperative we ALSO deal with the way whistleblowers are treated. Is this an Obama issue? Yes, but only to the extent that he, too, has failed to curb excesses and take whistleblowers seriously.


"it seems imperative we ALSO deal with the way whistleblowers are treated".
Question, how do we deal with it? We're constantly learning more about these agencies and their transgressions (NSA, IRS, homeland security, etc). How do we deal with it? How will it ever change?


How do we deal with how whistleblowers are treated? Simple enough: They DON'T get put in prison. They DON'T get threatened. They DON'T suffer a fatal "accident."

As for reforming the various and sundry agencies, that's also simple enough. For example, in the case of the IRS and its targeting of conservative groups, the bosses involved — ALL of them — should be summarily fired. The biggest problem of all, it seems, is a lack of will in the political class to ensure reforms are made and that those reforms actually STICK.


You didn't answer my question. If every citizen agreed with what you say, that still does not make it a reality. I'm asking "how" would we as Americans, make it a reality?