Obama seeking congressional OK for Syria action

President challenges lawmakers to consider 'what message will we sent if a dictator can gas hundreds of children to death in plain sight and pay no price'
Associated Press
Aug 31, 2013

Delaying what had loomed as an imminent strike, President Barack Obama abruptly announced Saturday he will seek congressional approval before launching any military action meant to punish Syria for its alleged use of chemical weapons in an attack that killed hundreds.

With Navy ships on standby in the Mediterranean Sea ready to launch their cruise missiles, Obama said he had decided the United States should take military action and that he believes that as commander in chief, he has "the authority to carry out this military action without specific congressional authorization."

At the same time, he said, "I know that the country will be stronger if we take this course and our actions will be even more effective." His remarks were televised live in the United States as well as on Syrian state television with translation.

Congress is scheduled to return from a summer vacation on Sept. 9, and in anticipation of the coming debate, Obama challenged lawmakers to consider "what message will we sent if a dictator can gas hundreds of children to death in plain sight and pay no price."

The president didn't say so, but his strategy carries enormous risks to his and the nation's credibility, which the administration has argued forcefully is on the line in Syria. Obama long ago said the use of chemical weapons was a "red line" that Syrian President Bashar Assad would not be allowed to cross with impunity.

Nor was it clear what options would be open to the president if he fails to win the backing of the House and Senate for the military measures he has threatened.

Only this week, British Prime Minister David Cameron suffered a humiliating defeat when the House of Commons refused to support his call for military action against Syria.

Either way, the developments marked a stunning turn in an episode in which Obama has struggled to gain international support for a strike, while dozens of lawmakers at home urged him to seek their backing.

Halfway around the world, Syrians awoke Saturday to state television broadcasts of tanks, planes and other weapons of war, and troops training, all to a soundtrack of martial music. Assad's government blames rebels in the Aug. 21 attack, and has threatened retaliation if it is attacked.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, saying he was appealing to a Nobel Peace laureate rather than to a president, urged Obama to reconsider. A group that monitors casualties in the long Syrian civil war challenged the United States to substantiate its claim that 1,429 died in a chemical weapons attack, including more than 400 children.

By accident or design, the new timetable gives time for U.N. inspectors to receive lab results from the samples they took during four days in Damascus, and to compile a final report. After leaving Syria overnight, the inspection team arrived in Rotterdam a few hours before Obama spoke.

The group's leader was expected to brief Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Sunday.

Republicans generally expressed satisfaction at Obama's decision to seek congressional support, and challenged him to make his case to the public and lawmakers alike that American power should be used to punish Assad.

"We are glad the president is seeking authorization for any military action in Syria in response to serious, substantive questions being raised," House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio and other House Republican leaders said in a joint statement.

"In consultation with the president, we expect the House to consider a measure the week of September 9th. This provides the president time to make his case to Congress and the American people."

New York Republican Rep. Peter King was among the dissenters, strongly so. "President Obama is abdicating his responsibility as commander in chief and undermining the authority of future presidents," he said. "The president doesn't need 535 Members of Congress to enforce his own red line."

Senior administration officials said Obama told aides on Friday night that he had changed his mind about ordering a strike against Syria without seeking congressional approval first, making a final decision after a long discussion with his chief of staff Denis McDonough.

It was unclear what pressure Republican or Democratic lawmakers had brought on Obama, if any, although dozens have signed letters calling on him not to act unilaterally.

But had he gone ahead with a military strike, he would have become the first U.S. leader in three decades to attack a foreign nation without mustering broad international support or acting in direct defense of Americans. Not since 1983, when President Ronald Reagan ordered an invasion of the Caribbean island of Grenada, has the U.S. been so alone in pursuing major lethal military action beyond a few attacks responding to strikes or threats against its citizens.

For now, it appeared that the administration's effort at persuasion was already well underway.

The administration plunged into a series of weekend briefings for lawmakers, both classified and unclassified, and Obama challenged lawmakers to consider "what message will we send to a dictator" if he is allowed to kill hundreds of children with chemical weapons without suffering any retaliation.

At the same time, a senior State Department official said Secretary of State John Kerry spoke with Syrian Opposition Coalition President Ahmed Assi al-Jarba to underscore Obama's commitment to holding the Assad government accountable for the Aug. 21 attack.

While lawmakers are scheduled to return to work Sept. 9, officials said it was possible the Senate might come back to session before then.

Obama said Friday he was considering "limited and narrow" steps to punish Assad, adding that U.S. national security interests were at stake. He pledged no U.S. combat troops on the ground in Syria, where a civil war has claimed more than 100,000 civilian lives.

In Syria, some rebels expressed unhappiness with the president, one rebel commander said he did not consider Obama's decision to be a retreat. "On the contrary, he will get the approval for congress and then the military action will have additional credibility," said Qassem Saadeddine.

"Just because the strike was delayed by few days doesn't mean it's not going to happen," he said.

With Obama struggling to gain international backing for a strike, Putin urged him to reconsider his plans. "We have to remember what has happened in the last decades, how many times the United States has been the initiator of armed conflict in different regions of the world, said Putin, a strong Assad ally. "Did this resolve even one problem?"

Even the administration's casualty estimate was grist for controversy.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, an organization that monitors casualties in the country, said it has confirmed 502 deaths, nearly 1,000 fewer than the American intelligence assessment claimed.

Rami Abdel-Rahman, the head of the organization, said he was not contacted by U.S. officials about his efforts to collect information about the death toll in the Aug. 21 attacks.

"America works only with one part of the opposition that is deep in propaganda," he said, and urged the Obama administration to release the information its estimate is based on.

Obama was buffeted, as well, by some lawmakers challenging his authority to strike Syria without congressional approval, and also by others who urged him to intervene more forcefully than he has signaled he will.

In the hours before Obama's Rose garden announcement, he was joined at the White House by top advisers.

Vice President Joseph Biden, who had planned a holiday weekend at home in Delaware, was among them. So, too, were Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Secretary of State John Kerry and other top administration officials.

In the famously flammable Middle East, Israel readied for the possible outbreak of hostilities. The Israeli military disclosed it has deployed an "Iron Dome" missile defense battery in the Tel Aviv area to protect civilians from any possible missile attack from next-door Syria or any of its allies.

Missile defenses were deployed in the northern part of the country several days ago, and large crowds have been gathering at gas mask-distribution centers to pick up protection kits.




Just checking in on this thread, did he have dinner with his momma and get permission to attack yet : )

The Big Dog's back

So, you want us to attack? Tell bohner to call Congress back and vote for it.


I normally can't stand to listen to Glen Beck, but he is right on the money with this message (and delivery).

Very alarming when Beck and Putin make more sense than our elected officials


All he needs now is some fava beans and a nice chianti.

Darwin's choice

Big Dog says..."you want us to attack?"

No,his comment was about the waffler-in-charge, and who is really running the White House!

The Big Dog's back

What has he waffled on?


[sound of crickets] in Darwin's skull.

Darwin's choice

azzhat Obama sheep.


Obama care for number 1!

The Big Dog's back

Explain how he "waffled".


As you already know, he can't.

He's a Republican , kool aid drinking, troll.


says the internet tough guys sitting behind a fake name slinging mud. you chumps should really look in the mirror.....such tough guys.


Re: "So, you want us to attack?"

You support the POTUS aiding al-Qaeda in Syria don't you putz?

Pres. Obama:

"I have decided that the United States should take military action against Syrian regime targets."


The Big Dog's back

Prove they are Al Qaeda. Oh wait, you can't because you're not there.



Join up putz and put your body where your shallow brain pan is.


It's very simple, China and Russia suppoort Assad and O'Bama supports the Muslim Brotherhood just as He always backs them.
Agent Orange (roughly 3 parts per million) simply refers to the Orange stripe on the barrels. Agent Purple was a lot more potent at around 33-35 ppm and I think Agent White came in around 65 ppm. I think there are a couple more colors that I fail to remember but all are more potent than agent orange. This has been going on for How Long? They say maybe 18 months. I say a couple centuries. Why hurry now?

The Big Dog's back

China and Russia supported Saddam Hussein. What's your point?


The point is Obama wants the muslim brotherhood radicals in charge, not dictators AND Obama is doing just that over there.


A Jewish guy was walking along a Lake Erie beach and kicked a bottle. A Genie came out and granted Him one wish. "Let there be peace in the Middle East". The Genie explained that the greatest Genies of all time haven't been able to achieve peace in the Middle East. Okay, then I'd like to see the Browns go to the Super Bowl. The Genie said, "I'll working on getting peace in the Middle East".


Smoke and mirrors. This has nothing to do with Syria at all. Its all about the votes and future elections and guess who will be right behind this....Hillary Clinton.

I love hearing the left cry about Iraq and the weapons that they didn't find. Ummm, pardon me but we did find and kill 3 weapons of mass destruction. They were Saddam and his 2 sons, who killed and tortured nearly a million Iraqi people over their time of rule.

Fast forward to Syria...who has been killing and torturing its people for years...and NOW we want to do something about it? Get in Obama's way and discredit his want for more war and you look like a selfish uncaring person. Agree with him and go to war AGAIN, and he and his party (and the overwhelmingly liberal media) will use this as ammo come election time.

Obamas handling of Syria over the last year reads like a book on "what not to do with foreign relations"

But go ahead liberals, support your buffoon and puppet master. No more war, except when the MESSIAH wants it.

He (Obie) wants to out dictators and fill their positions with elite radicals from the Muslim Brotherhood and you people just cannot see this obvious stuff.


Run along and go sell your beauty cream.


Ah, personal attacks from the internet tough man. Jealous much? I think so.


You call that an attack?
Then you are pretty weak.
Jealous of you ?
Ah, not at all.
It's probably your wife's business that supports you.


Re: "Obamas handling of Syria"

And Egypt and Libya and Yemen and Iran, et al.


@contango.....this is what you get when you elect a president with ZERO foreign experience. His entire foreign blueprint has been a failure from day one.


Always two sides, not sure what our government wants to do? Go bomb the insurgents since they are killing children too? What a cluster F!



How the Rest of the World Views the American Military
Paul Waldman lays out a list of significant US military actions over the past 50 years, and it adds up to 15 separate episodes, ranging from full-scale wars (Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan) to smaller incursions (Grenada, Haiti, Panama). For those of you who are math challenged, this means we've launched a significant overseas assault every 40 months since 1963. Waldman explains what this means:



We really want the rest of the world to Respect Us? Bomb and kill more people and stick our nose into "THEIR" business to gain more respect? NEWS FLASH! They already hate us more than their own enemies. We need them to look up to us so maybe we'll gain more favors? Remind Me Please, when was the last time any of these countries did anything for us?