"2013 should be the year we begin to solve our debt through tax reform and entitlement reform," Boehner said.
Boehner and Obama have taken the initial steps in high-stakes negotiations over how to deal with expiring Bush-era tax cuts and automatic spending cuts to defense and domestic programs that economists warn could plunge the nation into another recession.
Boehner, Obama and Senate leaders face a Jan. 2 deadline to reach an agreement or at least come up with a framework to deal with the issue early next year.
Boehner expressed a degree of optimism about resolving the issues and ensuring that his sometimes reluctant GOP rank and file will back any deal.
"When the president and I have come to an agreement, there's been no problem getting it passed in the House," Boehner said.
The speaker declined to discuss specifics on deficit targets or what tax loopholes to eliminate though he cited both corporate and individual.
"I don't want to box myself in. I don't want to box anyone else in," he said.
Boehner indicated that increasing the nation's borrowing authority, which was a divisive issue in August 2011 talks, should be part of any talks in the coming weeks on avoiding the fiscal cliff. The government has said the nation won't reach the debt limit until the spring.
"It's an issue that's going to have to be addressed, sooner rather than later," he said.
Boehner said he had a brief, cordial conversation with Obama earlier in the week and reiterated that the president needs to lead on the negotiations.
Democrats have resisted including entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security in any deficit-cutting deal. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said earlier this week they were unwilling to make changes in Social Security.
Boehner insisted that the programs need to be on the table.
"It's not like there is money in Social Security and Medicare" trust fund, Boehner said. "This has to be dealt with."
The Ohio Republican, reflecting the sentiment of his caucus, said increasing the maximum 35 percent tax rate on high-income earners cannot be part of the deal. Boehner did signal that he was open to eliminating loopholes.
"The problem with raising tax rates on wealthy Americans is that more than half of them are small business owners," Boehner said. "Raising tax rates will slow down our ability to create the jobs that everyone says they want."
The Republican leader acknowledged that his party faces several roadblocks after Obama won a second term and the GOP lost seats in both the House and the Senate.
"It's clear that as a political party we've got some work to do," he said.
Republicans fared poorly with Hispanic voters. The fastest growing minority group went heavily for Democrats, backing Obama by more than 70 percent. Boehner signaled a willingness to tackle immigration legislation next year.
"What I'm talking about is a common sense, step-by-step approach, would secure our borders, allow us to enforce the laws, and fix a broken immigration system," he said. "But again on an issue this big, the president has to lead."







Comments
@Contango
Exactly, One assumption is just as good as another. Some turn to religion as a day to day belief Others to science. A balance can be attained if the religion does not squash their ability to question and find answers and visa versa. All beliefs are and should be personal decisions that can and should be discussed in a polite and easy manner, Arguing with a belief is foolhardy at best and will accomplish nothing.
Back to the string theory, Some scientist will swear it is a viable theory and work tirelessly to prove it, It is a belief they strive to prove. The religious have no need of proof beyond what they see with their own eyes and since everyone sees things different there is no need to debate the beliefs, Nothing will change.
Sorry for the paragraph coffee is kicking in and im really uncomfortable discussing religion.
@ Randy_Marsh:
IMO, it's really debating metaphysics and epistemology - not religion.
The question to me is: How does one “know” what one claims to know?
Socrates said: I know nothing.
The Bible is a mishmash of contradictory beliefs; one can attempt to validate a position by quoting a certain passage.
@Contango
You and I agree, We know nothing. I cannot or will not defend any certain dogma, But i can defend my right to assume a unknown because as a species we truly know nothing. Metaphysics is just as interesting to me as science.
If my belief in an afterlife is wrong, I'll never know.
If your belief there is no afterlife is wrong... you definitely WILL know.
I like my odds better.
Don't let religion get in the way of or impede faith.
john
Ive got a good idea of how they are going to respond.
Wait for it, wait for it.
@ 4shizzle:
Be sure to tell your imaginary friends I said "Hi," the next time you conjure them up in your mind.
@ con
My invisible friends know who you are.
@John
"I like my odds better" Yes that would be correct,You in your belief have better odds. Your belief is just that, Yours. The problem with discussing dogma's is it never leads to a concensious, Just hurt feelings and usually a argument. With that said, I'm out. Believe what you will, Your beliefs are one of the only things that are truly yours.
Please do not get me wrong. I cannot nor will not defend a religion or dogma But i will defend your right to believe it.
Isn't that "don't let religion get in the way of faith"?
I didn't say my odds are better. I said I LIKE them better.
If there is nothing, I will know nothing. On the chance (and my own experiences) there is 'something', I plan to be in the warmth of The Light than in the heat of 'The Pit'.
Godspeed!
randy
If you tell me where you are coming from, ie. denomination, thought , faith, system, I promise not to be an obnoxious jerk.
@4shizzle
Please excuse my dodging of the answer to this question. Beliefs and dogma discussions on a public forum not intended for that make me extremely uncomfortable. Rest assured that i do have a belief system and never mean anything to offend those who believe otherwise.
Interesting but,ok
@ John Harville:
A limited choice fallacy.
Wow. How did a discussion about the boner get off on religion and an afterlife? And Contango... I'm confused by your phallusy statement. explain please?
@ cat
You've got to go back a few pages.
Blogging Gone Wild.
@John
As i said, You are correct according to your own belief's. Others beliefs may vary as is their right to believe as well.
Good luck to you!
Thanks! I greatly enjoyed my moment in The Light and though I'm in no rush, I welcome my return there. The heat and light of 10,000 suns that neither burn nor blind.
All of you are soooooooooooooo funny! Is the moon full? Sean Hannity is in favor of the Dream Act and a Pathway to Citizenship. Bill Kristol says increasing taxes wouldn't be a bad idea. Ben Stein says the government is going to have to increase taxes to get out of this mess. Eric Cantor knew about the Petraeus affair in OCTOBER but didn't say anything. Now we can't trust STRAIGHTS in the Military to keep it in their pants. Texans - and 17 others want to secede. The Kochs and Adelson and others want their $300 million back since all it accomplished was 'asset redistribution'. @Contango and @Marsh are discussing religion and the afterlife/not. We'll know the earth has spun off its axis when The Donald gets a haircut...
Ironic, aint it?
Wouldnt a strong breeze give trump a haircut?
randy,
A little teeny tiny hint?
4shizzle
Beliefs are personal,I believe in tolerance of other beliefs whatever they may be to the point where my own personal beliefs are irrevelant to the discussion in order to avoid conflicts and ugly scenes and arguments.
Randy,
Maybe your belief is the one I need. Would you deny a drowning man a life-saver if you had one?
Does your belief have a name? New Age,Buddhism, or something you made up?
Unless you've used your real name in this comment blog,you have anonymity. If you didn't, and you're afraid someone would recognize you on the street---well,that's unfortunate.
4shizzle
While i would never deny another a life preserver, I could not justify giving the man a boat. Beliefs are built by that person alone,Just as those born in Rome probably are Catholic those born in Mecca are Islamic. It is our ability to look beyond taught dogma's that are dependent apon others and places of birth to build a belief system that will sustain us through our tough times and questions that are unanswered by listening and not dictating.
randy,
That was a very disappointing, high sounding response.
Your belief system seems unable to give any hope or comfort , whatever it is, and something I wont pursue you about any longer.
4shizzle
I did not mean to be offensive at all. True beliefs no matter what it is comforts those who believe in it, There is no one size fits all.Beliefs arent learned they are made.
pleeeeeez. You expect us to belief you don't care whether the president is Muslim or Christian? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeez!
uhnooooo. If we could post photos I could prove it. No, it's his... but even if not, a strong wind would not be Trump CHOOSING a buzz.
randy,
Belief in anything is ok just as long as it makes you feel good?
If it feels good, do it philosophy.
Ok, I got my hint.
Thanks
4Shizzle
Im sorry i cannot help you.More of the answers you are seeking type thing, Not all the answers feel good but they do answer the questions which does confort me in a way.
Pages