I'm hardly an uncritical admirer of President Obama. But when he does something right, it seems only fair to defend him.
If you follow the news, you know by now that a suspected terrorist named Ahmed Ghailani was acquitted of most of the charges against him. The jury convicted him on one charge and may still serve a very long prison sentence.
The received wisdom from the daily papers claims the outcome as "a setback for advocates of civilian trials," as this Washington Post piece puts it. Predictably, the Wall Street Journal calls the outcome of the trial a "fiasco."
Perhaps the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal lament the fact that we haven't become a nation of kangaroo courts. Perhaps they prefer the court system of countries such as North Korea, where the observer may confidently predict the outcome of a show trial by knowing the preferences of the Dear Leader. It seems to me that a fair court system that protects the rights of the accused can be a point of pride for all Americans.